Comparison Of 1984 By George Orwell To The Actual 1984 Essay -- Compar

Comparison Of 1984 By George Orwell To The unfeigned 1984 Since the on pile of the United States, Americans have always viewed the future in ii ways one, as the perfect on the wholeiance with a perfect authorities, or two, as a communistic hell where free will no longer exists and no one is happy. The novel 1984 by George Orwell is a conspiracy of both theories. On the bad side, a communist state exists which is enforce with surveillance technology and loyal patriots. On the good side, however, everyone in the society who was born after the hostile takeover, which converted the once democratic government into a communist government, isnt angry about their life, nor do they wish to transpose any aspect of their life. For the few infidels who exist, it is a maddening existence, of constant report and brainwashing. George Orwells novel was definitely divergent from the actual 1984, but how different were they? They were different in 3 ways government, society, and thought.198 4 starts out with a so seeed betrayer to the party, Winston Smith, walking through the streets nervously observing the video cameras that are reflexion his every move. He makes his way into his apartment and produces a journal from his finishing pocket. He thinks that even this simple act of attempting to keep track of snip and history could get him vaporized. This scene portrays the strong grip the government has on its patrons. A person either obeys them, or is killed, or put into a forced labor camp. After Winston starts an illegal affair with a jr. woman he gets careless and the party finds out that he has commit what they call thought crimes. A thought crime is the intent to do something illegal but not actually doing it. In Winstons world a thought crime is just as severe as a physical crime. They arrest him and his girlfriend and torture them until they realize what they did was wrong and that they retire the party and will never do anything to hurt it again.The two go vernmental systems were different in a very major way. The actual government of England in 1984 was a democracy. This democracys foundation was made up of a fan tan and a prime minister. Most other nations of the time had the same set up. In Orwells novel an oligarchic state existed. Airstrip One, which is the area we call England, was home to Winston and the central government of Oceania (a large natio... ...omething without actually doing it. In Oceania a thought crime is just as bad as a physical crime.The penalty for such an offense is that you are taken to the Ministry of deal, but not killed. You are now brainwashed until you love the Party. Obrien, an upcountry party member, justifies this by stating that all great nations of the past fell because they killed all people who didnt the likes of them. The Party will never fall because they dont bring on martyrs. All people they eliminate love the Party when they are finally killed. For example Winston is captured and brough t to the Ministry of Love, he then is brainwashed and released to society when he sincerely yours liked the Party. Once he lived in the community for a sequence longer he is shot in the back of the head. The trains of thought, government, and society of the category 1984 versus George Orwells 1984 are clearly different. After looking at the differences I stated, the think why most people who have read the book find sorry for Winston should be more apparent than ever. The creation of books with story lines like 1984 help to shape our opinions of how the world should be, and make our views stronger than they have ever been.