Wednesday, February 13, 2019
The Marxist and Functionalist Perspectives on the Family Essay
The Marxist and Functionalist Perspectives on the Family For the purpose of this essay question I provide discuss the Marxist and the Functionalist perspectives on the Family. I will compare and counterpoint them and give a critical analysis of distributively and place them in historical context as well as modern day. In Britain today there are many different types of families. A mixer social unit living together defines what a family is. The family resembles the core feature of monastic order. both(prenominal) Marxist and Functionalist perspectives believe the family is what holds clubhouse together and helps socialise the future generations. at that place are three types of family existing in todays society. The atomic family resembles a family unit made up of no more than dickens generations, stereotyped as a mother, father and 2.4 children. The extended family refers to a family unit made of many three generations or more who live with each other or near by. This type is typical of pre-industrial or bad-mannered societies. The third type of family is the reconstituted. This type has become more apparent in modern day society. It refers to adults who have married before and have brought their children from the offset printing marriage to the second, creating a new family unit. It is important to note that not either household includes a family for example student flats. The functionalist perspective believe society is like a machine in that all its institutions sustain perseverance and consensus and keep society running smoothly. Functionalists believe the family contributes to societys canonical needs and helps maintain social order. Functionalists have been criticised for placing too much ... ...e into initiation with the invention of private property. Both Murdock and Parsons paint a very crimson picture of family biography. They fail to take in account the darker side of society a nd family issues such as domestic abuse etc. Parsons views on custody and women in relationships are often out dated. A lot of women these years are the breadwinners in the family and therefore the husband and wife roles have been reversed. Functionalist do not recognise that women suffer from the sexual division of labour trance Marxists highlight this is their theory. Marxists also come under scrutiny for exaggerating the importance of the family life as being a refuge from the capitalist society. Marxists also underestimation darker issues such as violence within the home etc. Zaretsky overemphasises the point that family and work are separated.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment