Monday, March 4, 2019
Position Argument In Marriage Essay
labor union is a ceremony or an act completed through pledge by which man and woman beseem husband and wife. It is a loving, condole with relationship that provides intimacy and security to all couples. It is entered into because of ensuing political, economic and former(a) advantages and not just of mutual affection. It is viewed legally as well-behaved unions, a legal location and a social institution that simplifies and organizes of the essence(p) matters for the partners. umpteen research studies show that a expert married couple is both manpowers and womens bet for life-time a long and red-blooded life e circumscribedly in the bea of adult health and well- cosmos. A leading social scientist name James Q. Wilson explains that persons of the same age who be married have happier life than those who argon unmarried. Married mess on command be better off and significantly esteem high levels of physical and mental health and enjoy greater emotional victuals and t end to be healthier than those who ar either single, divorced or living together. (Wilson 2002)MARRIAGE AND GENDER ISSUESDr. Robert Coombs of UCLA made a study on recent empirical studies published on how marriage affects adults well- cosmos. In his review it shows that there is an intimate link between marital status and individualised well-being.On aspect of alcoholism, Coombs review found that there are however fifteen percent of the chronic problems drinkers are married as compared to the fifty five percent who are either divorced or secernated. On the other hand, single men are more than three quantify as likely to die of cirrhosis of the liver. (Coombs 1991)Married people besides tend to have long and healthy life. As reported by Erasmus University in Rotterdam married people have lowest morbidity grade, eyepatch divorced people show highest morbidity rates. Dr. Coombs research review agrees with these findings, as he comments virtually every study of mortality and m arital status shows that the unmarried of both sexes have higher death rates, whether by accident, disease, or self-inflicted wounds. (Coombs 1991)Dr. Benjamin Malzberg conducted a research and he concludes that married population in general has much low rates of mental disease than some(prenominal) of the other marital groups. another(prenominal) research conducted jointly at Yale University and UCLA that supports Dr. Malzbeg findings. consonant with other researches conducted, result of the joint research also concludes that married persons enjoy better health than the unmarried and founds that the highest rates of mental disorder are among the divorced and separated. The lowest rates are among the married and average rates among the single and widowed. (Malzberg 1996)One the best results of the research conducted of impact of marriage is that it offers general happiness. Married person has significantly higher level of happiness than persons who are not married.What about the h omosexuals do they have rights to enter into marriage? maybe yes or maybe no. Same-sex marriage is a term for a governmentally, socially, or religiously recognized marriage in which two people of the same sex live together as a family. However, the legitimacy of marriage depends on the authoritative definition of marriage.ARGUMENTS SUPPORTING GAY AND sapphic MARRIAGEProf. Sally Haslanger in his arguments in support to gay and homosexual marriage has point out two (2) issues to consider. The issues on equality and issues on promoting good values that leads to good life. These issues are supported by arguments of marriage as normative ideal, the potential of gay marriage for at a lower placemining traditional sex norms, and the unjust displacement of gays and lesbians.On first argument uniting as normative ideal. The state has an bargain to promote valued ways of living that is why marriage is viewed by the state legally as civil unions, a legal status and a social institutio n that simplifies and organizes crucial matters for the partners. It is ideal for how sexuality, companionship, affection, personal economics and child rearing are being organized and put to order. Marriage also promotes personal and social golden in ways that are indifferent to other sexualities of the couple. Therefore, the state has an obligation to promote homosexual and straight person marriage. (Haslanger 2006)However, the groups of conservative and anti same-sex marriage are opposing this idea. A Conservatives objection to Haslanger first argument relates that gay and lesbian sex is not good for the individuals involved on it and it is not good for the social club.Second argument The potential of gay marriage for undermining traditional grammatical gender norms. Traditionally and on social norms societies are being dominated by males. It is supported by the strict separation of gender roles and the gendered division of labor. By legalizing same-sex marriage traditional ge nder norms and male domination are being challenge. Homosexuals have already been accepted during the 19th century that they are basically different from heterosexuals. The concept as a kind of naturally obstinate third sex. On the other hand, same-sex marriage is an effective way to support against injustice like violence against women. (Haslanger 2006) The conservatives agrees that our society currently live under male domination but they believe that is was just exaggerated. Conservatives points out that unmistakable gender roles do not necessarily support that male are more dominant. Its just that in society genders are separate but does not necessarily mean that they are not equal. (Haslanger 2006) Another objection to the second argument states that gays and lesbians are stereotypes. That they are dangerously uncontrolled, predatory, insatiable, self-loving and self-indulgent. Therefore, gays and lesbians are considered risky for assuming gendered familial roles, produci ng children and cannot sustain long-term static relationships. (Haslanger 2006)Third argument Reversing the unjust displacement of gays and lesbians.Arguments on these issues were structured as a response to DOMA (Defense of Marriage Act). This act was understood that marriage should except be between oneness man and one woman and become as a family that is considered as foundation of the society. This one man and one woman marriage are considered fit for establishing the foundation of society and are therefore essential citizens. Further, those who enters into marriage that differ from DOMA policies are therefore unfit and inessential citizens.With regards to gays and lesbians in relation to DOMA, gays and lesbian therefore lack the special status of essential citizens and same-sex relationships are not merely a life style choice. Approving same-sex relationship weakens the society. Advocates of same-sex marriage disagree to the arguments stated preceding(prenominal) they obs erve that they are being displace and discriminated. Gays and lesbians believe that the state should move on to treat marriage as a pre-political institution but allow in them as one of the societys foundation. Moreover, the state to consider marriage as a lifestyle choice and grant them rights similar to heterosexual marriage.SUMMARY Legal and moral case for gay and lesbian equality should be given due account by the state for them to feel that they are given equal treatment by the state and the society as a whole.Works CitedCoombs, Robert Marital Status and Personal public assistance A Literature Review, Family Relations 40 (1991) 97-102.Haslanger, Sally. Moral Problems and the Good aliveness. (2006)Malzberg, Benjamin. Marital Status in Relation to the Prevalence of Mental Disease, psychiatrical Quarterly 10 (1996) 245-261.Stanton, Glenn T. Why Marriage Matters. Retrieved 9 October 2007 from Wilson, James Q. The Marriage Problem How Our Culture Has Weakened Families New York Harper Collins, (2002), p. 16.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment